OR to speak up and risk losing everything. Shop Target for Socks you will love at great low prices. It's psychopath behavior. The US has a pretty high tolerance for violence in its protests. If Visa is a "utility," why are we clutching pearls when Trump is banned by them, but not Pornhub? Seems to work for Australia. Gen. Flynn was calling for public officials to be executed. I get that a payment service is not the same as a newspaper, but it is still a private entity. It’s not a legal issue. There was even one rioter caught on video carrying a literal pitchfork. > But political affiliation is not a protected class. You're still failing the civics test, as you don't seem to be aware that the entire point of the poll tests was never to actually test anything, but rather to serve as a pretext to deny people their constitutionally guaranteed voting rights. He can get checks. But let's justify action against them on actual laws, as opposed to because-SV-doesn't-like-them and has public support at the moment. > To be hyperfocused on the free speech or "big brother" aspect of these bans, not the fact that a small group of rioters were just a few feet away from irreversibly staining American history. Antifa and BLM rioters burned down apartment buildings with people still inside in Kenosha. Honor system? ", Yeah but ten years ahorita you used to have a lot more freedom in the same platforms as you know that please don’t be dishonest. But praising or bragging is a far cry from planning, persuading and instigating. If you want to understand the basis for a court decision, it's best to read the decision itself. One little warning from someone living in a real fascist state (Russia). I'm sure plenty of Trump supporters would be down with this plan. Democrats have challenged electors for dumb reasons before. I think the treatment of African slaves(& their descendants) in America is bad enough without having to exaggerate the origin. Headquarters - Sumner. Twitter and Stripe are acting in coordination - literally conspiring - with every other big tech company to take a specific action. > What changed? okay, so now someone asks me to leave and i say no, i am making thus and such a point. We would do well to imagine what it would be like to be prevented access with no legal recourse to an an oligopoly of services that cannot practically be bypassed, and ask ourselves what potential for abuse exists when such impactful decisions can be taken without standard legal due process. >What happens if the party in power next decides to attack religious organizations who congregate during that pandemic with the same type of concerted de-platforming? Couldn't you have made a similar argument for Twitter not being a public forum (prior to the court case)? If anything they're saving gullible people from sending money to a conman. Mass immigration to the coasts—where people coming from different political cultures back home would eventually start voting here-didn’t affect folks in the rest of the country as much during the mass immigration at the turn of the 20th century. More than 2,500 Stripes build products and support our users from offices in San Francisco, Chicago, New York City, Seattle, Amsterdam, Bangalore, Berlin, Dublin, London, Paris, Melbourne, Singapore, Mexico City, and Tokyo—as well as the homes and coworking spaces of our remote colleagues. That is very much the case and the policies of facebook and twitter have changed a lot, evne google removed the "dont be evil" from their ethics. While Trump is technically still POTUS, he is now seen as trying to undermine the rightful, peaceful transition of power to the next president, and what's important is that viewpoint is not only believed by the left, but now huge swaths of politicians and the electorate who at least gave Trump tacit support. The right and moral thing to do was to give the duly elected President latitude until it was massive in scope and objectively false. Where was the outrage when Pornhub was banned? The lies for profit charlatans basically get away with it. The ongoing purge -- would it not be seen as treason, as an act to in fact subvert/weaken a position of POTUS and therefore directly destabilize the US government? Learn more in our. crimes. Should we throw her in jail for sedition. And if they refuse? Stride Rite kids' shoes. I'm sorry if the conservatives can't understand the difference between BLM people yelling in the streets, and Trump people searching the capitol for senators and representatives to stop a Constitutionally mandated vote count. What changed? At individual and private level I can decide who will I spend my time with, who I will invite to my place, go to the beach etc, with no coercion and I expect everybody else to have that right too. How about Kamala Harriss posting a bail fund for violent rioters and criminals this past summer, wouldn't that fall squarely over the line of inciting, or instigating, or glorifying violence? Jim Clyburn has two offices in the Capitol, one right next to the front doors and one way up on the third floor. You can't design a program that won't be intentionally warped and abused to serve this ulterior motive, especially considering that you won't be running it; they will be. Which itself is a disinformation campaign, contributed to by government entities. They're forced to deal in cash and have all sorts of problems because of it (not least the fact that depositing large amounts of cash triggers money laundering regulations, and doing that too much can cause a bank to close the account). All I'm saying is, if you think the fact that it's not a utility is a good supporting argument for this, I'm saying their classification is far from obvious to me. Note that Erdogan, an actual dictator, with military offensives on record (Syria, Karabash, Libya) and war-like operations (radar illumination against French warship, violations of Greece territorial waters) is not restricted at all on Twitter while the only US president in recent times that didn’t send troops abroad or start a new war is censored. Jailtime? He was smart and would have easily passed any civics test you gave him, but he voted based on personality rather than any specific issue. Trump may claim that he is not responsible for the tiny (in proportion) riots that happened in DC. Yes, they technically have free speech, but in reality not really. Which terrorism does she support? That someone who has a publishing platform, they're forced to propagate your message, no matter what it is? Someone please help me understand the other side of this? (and of course, to complicate the situation further, the latter may want to disguise themselves as the former). Gallows happen to be a traditional prop at protests (eg, [0]). [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/06/technology/myanmar-facebo... BLM may claim not to be responsible for the horrendous roiots and crime that has been committed in its name across America. Yes, of course, that's how humans work. I will note the irony about people saying that we should respect society “decisions” when they didn’t respect Trump becoming president since day one . We need to speak to them in a language they understand—literally and metaphorically. Now it's all available to everyone. If he refused to provide groom&groom wedding toppers I'd fully support him but this is food not speech, Likewise I wouldn't expect him to write messages or make decorations he disagreed with, But in this case it's a simple case of discrimination. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Seems like the same spirit of the law to me, but you are explicitly right. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25722027&p=2, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25722027&p=3, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25722027&p=4, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25722027&p=5. [1] See https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/trump-v-knight-f... for the docket information. If we can regulate power utilities or force all businesses to shutdown during a pandemic, we can absolutely update our laws to regulate these companies, require them to uphold the first amendment, and provide due process. It has NOT been debunked. Violent protests are not unheard of. Over the summer, dozens of people were killed and there was billions of property damage (that's peoples homes and livelihoods, not just "stuff"). Do you not think people would take steps to prevent an illegitimate president from winning re-election? We operate at significant scale, but we’re still tiny relative to the opportunity. These platforms' failure to enforce their rules consistently doesn't mean they shouldn't have enforced them in this case, it means they should have been doing a better job all along. Political speech enjoys the highest level of protection in the US, political speech is one of the primary motivators behind the existence of constitutionally protected speech in the US. The First Amendment concerns the government's suppression of speech. Willing to be represented by officials that you can never peacefully vote out of office? It’s the Democrats that say an ID to vote is racist, while saying an ID is not racist for things like driving, flying, buying alcohol, working, getting a firearm, welfare checks, and so much more. What do you want twitter to do in the face of such overwhelming evidence coming from twitter? I'd further add that there are hundreds of hosting and co-location providers, dozens of payment processors and a variety of mechanisms to share data, information and messaging. > Violate them and you can take your business elsewhere. Great company, great people. Visit our online store, learn more about our incredible cartoonists, and catch up on all the latest news and events at the revamped Fantagraphics.com! If my water, power, or internet was cut off, I would immediately suffer real, life changing inconvenience and hardship. You have to consistently justify to these people you aren't brainwashed, because their default idea is that you are. Unfortunately I don't think it's a stretch to suggest that a large percentage of people across the political spectrum lack basic civics knowledge. Stripe is an Irish-American financial services and software as a service (SaaS) company dual-headquartered in San Francisco, California and Dublin, Ireland. Please provide some evidence for your claims. Yes, it's exclusively because of his using his Twitter account as an official outlet for government statements. There's no such thing as a “general protected class”; there are different lists (and different effects of the status) of protected classes in various categories of law (public accommodations, employment, housing, etc.). Another issue is that the "rules" for who and what gets booted and censored from these realms by an always shifting, opaque, and selectively enforced set of rules is to a statistically significant degree clearly bunched in certain areas of the ideological matrix. Also, how far do we go with this reasoning? I agree the War on Drugs is really a voter and general population suppression effort. The reality is that criminal acts took place on a scale that was truly shocking. Wasn't there a sort-of reverse issue a year or two ago, when the President was blocking people on twitter and a court ruled that he was violating their 1st amendment rights? Especially while they are implementing the transfer of power mandated by the Constitutional order. i imagine the person relating this kind of action, practiced en masse since the 60s across civil rights, nuclear nonproliferation, environmental, LGBT movements with storming barricades, dragging police from windows and beating them to death, and literally threatening the seat of government did not actually intend to conflate the two sorts of events. Except apparently in the minds of many HNers who live in some bizarre alternate reality. Facebook admitted to their role[1], but came up with a bunch of lame excuses like that they do not really have any content moderators that understand the language. Cultural relativism has become broadly accepted among the progressive left. But that, at best, upgrades the scene from a mostly peaceful protest torching vehicles to a violent clash with the police officer. SaaStr Podcast: Claire Hughes Johnson, COO @ Stripe. Imagine all the airlines were run by Republicans, and they universally prevented anyone who works for Democratic leaning organizations (Eg ActBlue) from flying because some small number of bad actors on their side did some bad things. And lastly, I have to fault the people who can't get their shit together enough once per 5 or 10 years (ID expiration timescale) for such an important piece of identification and key to so many other things. We have seen what his base will do. We recently made the prime actors of one of these initiatives the vice president. We were in that situation until Trump arrived. They are free to buy hardware and self host their website. They beat one police officer to death with a fire extinguisher and injured more than 50 others. I'm one of those people who has always loathed both liberals and conservatives, but the attack on the capitol went way too far. I was looking at the wrong part of the frame, under the arch and didn't see the staircase. > So the government should instead step in and decide what companies can and can't do with their own services & infrastructure? IMHO the decisions to de-platform these groups will do nothing to put a dent in their political ideology, and will only serve to throw gasoline on the fire at a contentious period where many millions of people feel like they don't have a voice. 852 2230 2300. Maybe it was growing up along the South Side Irish parade route in Chicago that programmed me this way, but I see no evidence of European ethnic heritage being suppressed in the US. It was a grassroots movement. This is "what about"-ism. We should be looking to open them up and break them apart. https://allthatsinteresting.com/voting-literacy-test. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point, ( https://reason.com/2019/08/26/secret-memos-show-the-governme... ). > That’s a far stretch from making it a general protected class. It seems that the people claiming that this the end of free speech are unaware that demonstrating that freedom of speech can have consequences. Those protesters wanted to hurt the police. I mean, the fundamental argument here is that we shouldn't mix the actions of the people on the stairwell facing the police with the rest of the protest. They might be the latter, but I wouldn't consider it obvious. Their own monster, which they had spent the last couple of decades nurturing, was out of control and in their house ready to devour them. or are "the rules" whatever they are today, selectively and over-zealously enforced in order to repress certain ideas and perspectives? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point. Lmao sounds like you believe popular support is an indicator of correctness and that is very very wrong you should read about Galileo pal. And it’s not just an American thing. I don't buy it. You've basically just said: "That shopowner has a right not to deal with blacks, why do they keep harassing that poor man by trying to buy his goods?". They erected a gallows with a noose outside the Capitol. Facebook is a US company with a lot more eyes on US activity than in Burma. What evidence can you provide that said corporations have a "preferred political party?". The decision specifically notes that he objected to being required to make cakes for same sex weddings entirely, on both free speech and free exercise of religion grounds [0], not that he was willing to do so dependent on messaging, so any such willingness he might have had was not a basis of the decision. Perhaps soon so will every major shift in the tech landscape. 広済会「つつじヶ丘」での活動内容をまとめた不定期の広報誌「つつじ」です。事業所でのイベント報告や収支決算報告、お世話になっている方への御礼などを紹介しております。 Kind of unrelated to the point of your post -- what does it mean when any discussion about current events/politics requires every poster to affirm they do not support a particular political candidate. It's already very difficult to orchestrate fraud without detection. Look back a few decades and this is exactly the same argument that segregationists were using. That isn't the case for these platforms. I dont really understand why it is so complicated. OC was talking about government buildings which are typically open to the public. Seems like a text book definition of a political party. It's apples and oranges. Stripe profited by the sensationalism and hate Trump generated over the last four years and now, at the end of his presidency, they finally pull the plug? The exact same thing happened when radio was first invented, Nazism rose to power in tandem with mass media that allowed for direct manipulation of people's emotions on a scale that was impossible prior to that. At Stripe, Product Managers help build innovative payments products for our customers. Perhaps a better person than me can be civil with these people, but I just don't give a fuck anymore. No one is required to allow someone to raise funds on their site - let freedom ring! Getting a driver's license is more about certifying your ability to drive than your identity. Some may want them to be. Lyft can concentrate on delighting drivers, We take pride in freeing up others to work in the spotlight. If one newspaper decided not to publish your piece, you could go to another. And Democratic politicians - including the VP-elect - provided bail for these criminals. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/06/technology/myanmar-facebo... https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2020/06/06/large-... https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/trump-v-knight-f... https://reason.com/2019/08/26/secret-memos-show-the-governme... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-zb58uiFjU. If there's nobody to talk to, you might as well not speak at all. There were gallows, bombs, armour, zip ties and guns brought to the protest. If they're not a utility when they kick off Pornhub, how can they possibly be a utility when they kick off Trump? Anyone who provides goods and services of any kind to the individuals and organisations responsible has a moral and legal duty to stop doing so - immediately. What did Trump say/do that called for violence? Today’s top 258 Stripe jobs in Seattle, Washington, United States. During the time in (comprehensive) public education that would also be a job they are paid a living wage for. But I don’t think anyone says they currently have utility obligations under the law. We try to embrace extreme interpersonal kindness while still encouraging Stripes to take measured risks and act boldly, even in the absence of consensus. And when nominally private, major industry is aligned with government to effect political ends, there's a word for that, and we've seen that before. Using Stripe through another platform. And Google is controlled by two as well [0]. Or even use the moment to pass new laws, covering the type of behavior we want to make illegal. You can try to pretend it's about "artistic expression" but in the end it's about wanting the ability to discriminate against a protected class that you don't like. New Adventure to Seattle awaits!Seattle is a seaport city on the West Coast of the United States. Or are you claiming that Stripe cannot choose its customers unless a court has convicted that customer of a crime? I'm not going to state my personal stance, because it's complicated and frankly, I haven't put enough thought into it to be comfortable presenting it.
2005 Pac-10 Football Standings, Canadian Shield Facts, Ccc Zoom Advising, איך עובד מבחן רורשאך, Dreamcatcher - Scream Live, La Galaxy Vs Seattle Sounders H2h, Class 1 Felony Virginia Examples, Gucci Episode 5,