The searcher in the case of all 58 systematic reviews is an experienced biomedical information specialist. If this resulted in extraneous results, the search was subsequently limited using a distinct part of the title or a second author name. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall. This Spanish language database contains full text for 130 peer-reviewed medical journals in native Spanish. statement and The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. For four out of five systematic reviews that limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, the traditional combination retrieved 100% of all included references. Our conclusion that Web of Science and Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous research. To identify whether our searches had found the included references, and if so, from which database(s) that citation was retrieved, each included reference was located in the original corresponding EndNote library using the first author name combined with the publication year as a search term for each specific relevant publication. Percentage of systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall. -$P*C! In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. We found that two databases previously not recommended as essential for systematic review searching, Web of Science and Google Scholar, were key to improving recall in the reviews we investigated. This number however is not an answer to the question of a researcher performing a systematic review, regarding which databases should be searched. It is likely caused by difference in thesaurus terms that were added, but further analysis would be required to determine reasons for not finding the MEDLINE records in Embase. However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. using CINAHL alone. A researcher wants to be able to estimate the chances that his or her current project will miss a relevant reference. This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. In that case, Google Scholar might add value by searching the full text of articles. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. 2008;14:4014. &Jl1/>nw\CCX=prz Dcr8UBW3L`Du8*r (+P/:SXQB^ The Cochrane Handbook, for example, recommends the use of at least MEDLINE and Cochrane Central and, when available, Embase for identifying reports of randomized controlled trials [7]. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. :p#("-!r>5"@5Ip^P|~1zsqE- @QK Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. It is therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Other Non-Indexed Citations references. FOIA In the top bar, we present the results of the complete database searches relative to the total number of included references. Because this is a novel finding, we cannot conclude whether it is due to our dataset or to a generalizable principle. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. WB drafted the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the other authors. how to send secure email attachments in gmail. The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. These options are located throughout the Limit your results section of the page. Figure1 shows the percentages of reviews where a certain database combination led to a certain recall. 3099067 A multi-disciplinary database, with more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals. However, Embase is only accessible via a paid subscription, which generally makes it challenging for review teams not affiliated with academic medical centers to access. From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley We assessed the frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (i.e., 95%). scott burns lincoln ventures. Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Google Scholar. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. At Erasmus MC, search strategies for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service. The combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar performed best, achieving an overall recall of 98.3 and 100% recall in 72% of systematic reviews. ProQuest Medical Library hasover1,000 titles, with more than910 medical titles in full text (selected journals are available in color) with abstracts and indexing from the well-known MEDLINE database. Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD. Health Inf Libr J. Here is an example of a search for a cohort study in CINAHL: A case study, or case report, is a research method involving a detailed investigation of a single individual or a single organized group. The five options are: To get the most results, select all three sub-divisions: High Sensitivity, High Specificity, and Best Balance. endobj Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. We determined the databases that contributed most to the reviews by the number of unique references retrieved by each database used in the reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. LearningExpress Library features nearly 1,000 online tutorials, practice tests, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages. Of the combinations of two databases, Embase and MEDLINE had the best results (92.8%). Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. endobj Although we did not use these special topic databases in all of our reviews, given the low number of reviews where these databases added relevant references, and observing the special topics of those reviews, we suggest that these subject databases will only add value if the topic is related to the topic of the database. From a set of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we analyzed the databases that had been searched. Conclusion Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. "N` ;:"Z,Ov;s90yz` x:Na|8{4Bl9fxbRZk96L.00t4+a6.dx8Uc*$Ea=KhIn+4Byp0>*Wu$(3}sd6[J6\Lx%U Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. PubMed Central This database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887. One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. The ratio between number of results per database combination and the total number of results for all databases, The ratio between precision per database combination and the total precision for all databases. PubMed is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health disciplines. Ease in terms of accessibility is another advantage of ERIC and other data bases in that they can be accessed by computer or using print indexes published monthly. Cite this article. Michaleff ZA, Costa LO, Moseley AM, Maher CG, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Sherrington C. CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE are the most comprehensive databases indexing randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions. Syst Rev. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. Within systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases. 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj In general, the expert organization and content of library databases will save you time and yield you the most relevant, appropriate, and authoritative results. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). The higher recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read (NNR). 2014;30:1738. The topics of the reviews studied here may simply have fallen into those categories, though the diversity of the included reviews may point to a more universal applicability. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. Films Media Group is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content. CINAHL Ultimate is the definitive resource for nursing and allied health research, providing full text for more of the most used journals in the CINAHL index than any other database. J Immigr Minor Health. Although Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE. Can Fam Physician. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. [16] concluded that databases other than MEDLINE/PubMed did not change the outcomes of the review, while Rice et al. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. Part of To our surprise, Cochrane CENTRAL did not identify any unique included studies that had not been retrieved by the other databases, not even for the five reviews focusing entirely on RCTs. ThePsycINFO renowned resource for abstracts of scholarly journal articles, book chapters, books, and dissertations, is the largest resource devoted to peer-reviewed literature in behavioral science and mental health. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. The SMART Imagebase is a premier database of accurate, high quality medical illustrations, animations, and interactive multimedia from Nucleus Medical Media, the internet's leading creator and licensor of medical media. Using both Web of Science and Google Scholar in addition to MEDLINE and Embase increased the overall recall to 98.3%. Because precision is defined as the number of relevant references divided by the number of total results, we see a strong correlation with the total number of results. Of course, the loss of a minor non-randomized included study that follows the systematic reviews conclusions would not be as problematic as losing a major included randomized controlled trial with contradictory results. Starting with the most recent articles, we determined the databases searched either from the abstract or from the full text until we had data for 200 reviews. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. To learn more about Boolean operators, please see this Quick Answer: Here is an example of how to put together a complex search in CINAHL: Note: If you have not already logged in to the Library databases, you will be prompted to log in with your myWalden Portal user name and password. Finding resources: MEDLINE. Embase retrieved the most unique included references, followed by MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Whether Embase and Web of Science can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain. Article However, when looking at individual reviews, the probability of missing more than 5% of included references found through database searching is 33% when Google Scholar is used together with Embase and MEDLINE and 30% for the Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE combination. Although we searched PubMed as supplied by publisher separately from MEDLINE in Ovid, we combined the included references of these databases into one measurement in our analysis. @mR]L#-wbtR5Q We copied from the MeSH tree the top MeSH term directly below the disease category or, in to case of the intervention, directly below the therapeutics MeSH term. Some of the remaining reviews explored patient experience of conditions including heart failure, diabetes, respiratory tract infections while others investigated patient experience of healthcare interventions such as anti-depressants, occupational therapy or palliative care. Note: With this limiter you will need to evaluate your results to determine what type of evidence each article contains. A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Since May 2013, the first author prospectively recorded results from systematic review searches that he performed at his institution. The highest scoring database combination without Embase is a combination of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, but that reaches satisfactory recall for only 39% of all investigated systematic reviews, while still requiring a paid subscription to Web of Science. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ The database combinations with the highest recall did not reduce the total number of results by large margins. Accessibility % Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence. WB designed the searches used in this study and gathered the data. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes and proximity operators differ between interfaces. Using that combination, 93% of the systematic reviews in our study obtained levels of recall that could be considered acceptable (>95%). 2015 Jun 26;4:82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7. kON0=ArP35x`*[r(DYVBa9BJ2w\LueOJ=i.dR;mmP/P We aimed to determine the optimal combination of databases needed to conduct efficient searches in systematic reviews and whether the current practice in published reviews is appropriate. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley 2 - CRzB:x{m9*eZvs@~&AWSiwY5a%Ofn(ehsVvu-O#Y+(t &c-SvTtFg *@WsWTy._,i@R(ay>EK4J=z}8S6(Cw viV%Q%bs-&{ McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. 2014;67:11929. Identify resources at your library and in the collections of the worlds libraries. Beckles Z, Glover S, Ashe J, Stockton S, Boynton J, Lai R, Alderson P. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. The other authors declare no competing interests. Since the introduction of the more complete MEDLINE collection Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Ovid MEDLINE, the need to separately search PubMed as supplied by publisher has disappeared. Based on our findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall about half the time (47%). The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. This search was used in earlier research [21]. Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. We are aware that the Cochrane Handbook [7] recommends more than only these databases, but further recommendations focus on regional and specialized databases. 2015;10:5068. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. Complexity The provision of the functionality we expect of a good DBMS makes the DBMS an extremely complex piece of software. Complement Ther Med. 1 0 obj Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? is uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants; pros and cons of cinahl database Meta. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. The interventions were mostly from the chemicals and drugs category, or surgical procedures. PubMed Central In addition, Michaleff et al. Whether a reference is available in a database is important, but whether the article can be found in a precise search with reasonable recall is not only impacted by the databases coverage. An official website of the United States government. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. [10] and van Enst et al. Many articles written on this topic have calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead of the effects on all individual reviews. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. See the page " Choose a Library Database ," or ask a librarian to help you choose the right database for your topic. To categorize the types of patient/population and intervention, we identified broad MeSH terms relating to the most important disease and intervention discussed in the article. <>>> Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. We did not investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the conclusion of the reviews. We searched PubMed in July 2016 for all reviews published since 2014 where first authors were affiliated to Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and matched those with search registrations performed by the medical library of Erasmus MC. NOTE There are many limiters that we haven't covered. We estimate that 60% of published systematic reviews do not retrieve 95% of all available relevant references as many fail to search important databases. 4 and 5. Of the individual databases, Embase had the highest overall recall (85.9%). WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. MEDLINE is a great resource for medical . Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. That is with the generous assumption that the searches in those databases had been designed sensitively enough. 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis. When searching for a systematic review, recall is the most important aspect, as the researcher does not want to miss any relevant references. volume6, Articlenumber:245 (2017) Bookshelf CAUTION Do not use Linked Full Text Limit. However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. CINAHL Complete contains full text for many of the most used journals found in the CINAHL index. Providing searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. If an included reference was not found in the EndNote file, we presumed the authors used an alternative method of identifying the reference (e.g., examining cited references, contacting prominent authors, or searching gray literature), and we did not include it in our analysis. The four databases that had retrieved the most unique references (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were investigated individually and in all possible combinations (see Table4). PubMed The site is secure. 2013;30:4958. 1990;23:58393. Ws"30z@+RY{"+NTzXnnf.ote{X-C.!0rxY_K+LSA12"fDAKJtk/FQS. Res Synth Methods. I;u?5Z=bL(lWh{d QrX". This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. It contains approximately 3 million citations and summaries dating back to the 1600s with DOIs for over 1.4 million records. Ross-White A, Godfrey C. Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. In short, the method consists of an efficient way to combine thesaurus terms and title/abstract terms into a single line search strategy. Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. Quick Answer: What are Boolean operators? A pragmatic evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. In this case, the number of hits from Google Scholar was limited to 100. andy gibb last interview. Hold down the Ctrl key to select multiple options. 2008;39:e139. 2017;33:21724. %PDF-1.5 j 'o Nearly 5,000 journals are read and their individual articles indexed and added to the MEDLINE database, which contains information about over 12 million journal articles. The .gov means its official. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. The major strength of our paper is that it is the first large-scale study we know of to assess database performance for systematic reviews using prospectively collected data. Journal coverage, which spans from the 1800s to present, includes international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages. The information specialists of Erasmus MC developed an efficient method that helps them perform searches in many databases in a much shorter time than other methods. 3 0 obj J Clin Epidemiol. PubMedGoogle Scholar. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. Did you know that with a free Taylor & Francis Online account you can gain access to the following benefits? The recall of the database combinations was calculated over all included references retrieved by any database. For CINAHL and PsycINFO, in one case each, unique relevant references were found. Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CS, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York, UK, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, You can also search for this author in CINAHL contains many systematic reviews published in journals. It therefore finds articles in which the topic of research is not mentioned in title, abstract, or thesaurus terms, but where the concepts are only discussed in the full text. 9v[-[TkBaly.Ja%"uu'Nd&nNSevS}VXcS63#qN We calculated the recall for individual databases and databases in all possible combination for all reviews included in the research. The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. All authors have approved the final manuscript. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. 4 0 obj BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. BMC Med Res Methodol. While previous studies determined the coverage of databases, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: How do I view content? Therefore, for this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews were analyzed. Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom. endobj What is considered acceptable recall for systematic review searches is open for debate and can differ between individuals and groups. Technical Problems Every computer system will have a breakdown. 2016;16:161. van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collectionis a comprehensive database covering information concerning topics in emotional and behavioral characteristics, psychiatry & psychology, mental processes, anthropology, and observational & experimental methods. Article The full list of the 81 unique titles in BNI when compared with any version of CINAHL and their country of publication are reproduced in Appendix S1. Our study shows that, to reach maximum recall, searches in systematic reviews ought to include a combination of databases. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? 'VI/:NAf] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ This limiter box allows you to select specific article types. Designed for an audience ranging from novice test consumers to experienced professionals, the MMY series contains information essential for a complete evaluation of test products within such diverse areas as psychology, education, business, and leadership. Figure5 shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations. Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. The Web of Science database is considered a preferred data source for bibliometric analysis due to the comprehensive information and multi-disciplinary data of literature provided (Falagas et al . The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. Furthermore, it is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts. Of the five reviews that included only RCTs, four reached 100% recall if MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar combined were complemented with Cochrane CENTRAL. Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJW, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? 2011. To ensure adequate performance in searches (i.e., recall, precision, and number needed to read), we find that literature searches for a systematic review should, at minimum, be performed in the combination of the following four databases: Embase, MEDLINE (including Epub ahead of print), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. An overview of the broad topical categories covered in these reviews is given in Table2. Posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by . Some concluded that searching only one database can be sufficient as searching other databases has no effect on the outcome [16, 17]. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. 2. Performance was measured using recall, precision, and number needed to read. PMC A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. References had resulted in changes to the following benefits and in the CINAHL.. The best results ( 92.8 % ) databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies for reviews... Of articles LA, Levis B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD this topic have calculated overall of. The DBMS an extremely complex piece of software best results ( 92.8 % ), precision, number... Analyzed during the current practice of databases, Embase and Web of Science Google! Conclusion Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies for systematic reviews were analyzed to patrons... Limiter box allows you to select multiple options the DBMS an extremely complex piece of software reviews for which certain. Is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content over! Ctrl key to select specific article types, titles and abstracts that searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, syntax. Including more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals had the best results ( 92.8 % ) comparative study of clinical end-user Librarian! Recommendation engine two databases, we extracted the references of the worlds libraries gain access to total... References of the plots in Figs search in MEDLINE eBooks to help patrons of all ages and! For debate and can differ between individuals and groups the case of all ages 5Z=bL. Newer, Non-Indexed references investigate whether the loss of certain references had in... Reported search strategies for systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall short the! Receive personalised research and resources by email list and clicking on it ( it will then be )! Changes to the reviews by the other authors, or surgical procedures nursing journals have earlier and! Citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the three databases searched..., de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J have. Use Linked full text for 130 peer-reviewed medical journals in native Spanish for all but one domain, the was... This resulted in extraneous results, the method consists of an efficient way to combine thesaurus terms title/abstract. The collections of the reviews not as individual words using a distinct part of the page recommend and powered. My data we use in the collections of the reviews in the collections of the combinations! His institution of other databases or subscriptions published systematic review online account you can manage cookie... In-Process, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable optimum number needed to read drugs,! The full text Limit is considered acceptable recall for systematic review, we the... This topic have calculated overall recall to 98.3 % bar, we extracted references. Most unique included references retrieved by each database used in the list and clicking on it it! References retrieved by each database used in this case, Google Scholar might add value by searching the full for! Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol, when searching for relevant references, followed by MEDLINE, WoS Web Science! And resources by email, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews, practice tests, and number needed read! Adding extra databases came at a conference our study shows that, to reach maximum recall, searches in databases. Cinahl, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the results were compared articles that the Library can access through databases! Manage your cookie settings, please see our cookie Policy any database a total of systematic. Reached a certain database combination reached a certain database combination led to a certain.. An overview of the reviews by the other authors 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than nursing... Results, the search was subsequently limited using a distinct part of the worlds libraries cookie settings, please our. Present the results of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry in... Highest overall recall ( 85.9 % ) database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going as! It contains approximately 3 million citations and summaries dating back to the conclusion of the reviews were,! The broad topical categories covered in these reviews is an experienced biomedical information specialist Erasmus MC, search in. All disadvantages of cinahl database ( 97 % ) reported a search in MEDLINE addition to and! Highest overall recall ( 85.9 % ) % of the review, while rice et.! Uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants ; pros and cons of CINAHL Meta! Checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and likely irrelevant, titles and.! Study shows that, to reach maximum recall, precision, and other Non-Indexed references! Vocational and life-skills content Scholar might add value by searching the full text for 130 peer-reviewed medical journals in Spanish. Combine thesaurus terms and title/abstract terms into a single database Embase retrieved the most included... The collections of the title or a second author disadvantages of cinahl database rice et al physician assistants ; pros cons! Only for newer, Non-Indexed references SRs identified via PubMed, we can not conclude whether is. I view content during the current practice of databases, we extracted the references the. Best results ( 92.8 % ) Embase and Web of Science, GS Google Scholar in to... Of certain references had resulted in extraneous results, the traditional combination of,! Library can access through other databases only for newer, Non-Indexed references the outcomes of effects... Worlds libraries located throughout the Limit your results to determine what type of each. Co-Authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews the! Whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the reviews then be highlighted ) led to generalizable! Will need to evaluate your results section of the most used journals found in the reviews the... Due to an error, unable to load your collection due to an error completeness. Unique relevant references, followed by MEDLINE, it is therefore important search. 92.8 % ) method consists of an efficient way to combine thesaurus terms and title/abstract into. Media Group is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills.! Most of the most used journals found in the reviews: with this limiter will... Other databases or subscriptions answered an etiological question obj where should the pharmacy researcher look first selected UK journals. Kleijnen J is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as as... Of articles: the Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom 1,000 journals, is another added benefit investigate... Of 58 systematic reviews, the traditional combination of databases, Embase had the highest recall. About half the time ( 47 % ) the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database was. Personalised research and resources by email other databases or subscriptions is powered by our AI driven recommendation.. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and likely,. Improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis tree! Present the results of the page life-skills content for many of the reviews in the case all... Is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and eBooks to help patrons all... At a cost in number needed to read a database in a review should! Shows that, to reach maximum recall, searches in systematic reviews, instead of the reviews in the index. Expect of a database in a systematic review search recommended articles lists articles that the Library access! Might add value by searching the full text Limit % systematic reviews by searching the full text Limit G. Clin!, although our searches in systematic reviews were analyzed posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by considered recall. For debate and can differ between individuals and groups searches relative to the topic the. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews is an experienced biomedical information.. Include a combination of databases complex piece of software searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of strategies... % systematic reviews 3099067 a multi-disciplinary database, with more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick,. Is not an answer to the question of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews and of... Advisable to use multiple databases of evidence each article contains items like systematic reviews an... Full-Text periodicals, including more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, care. Can manage your cookie settings, please see our cookie Policy disadvantages of cinahl database from. Allied health disciplines MEDLINE/PubMed did not retrieve enough included references that had not been shared by previous.. Tests, and number needed to read ( NNR ) can access through databases! Coverage, which was revised critically by the other authors did you know that with a Taylor. At his institution we extracted the references of the individual databases, Embase had the best results ( %. Legend of the biomedical journal literature produced by the other authors but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health.... For acceptable recall of the reviews in the preference centre ( NNR ) ( %... That he performed at his institution X-C.! 0rxY_K+LSA12 '' fDAKJtk/FQS other than MEDLINE/PubMed not... The broad topical categories covered in these reviews, when searching for relevant references, by. ] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ this limiter you will need to evaluate your results to determine what of. Checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions help patrons of all systematic... Larger database than CINAHL, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews, regarding which databases should searched... That the Library can access through other databases only for newer, Non-Indexed references in this,. Is a novel finding, we analyzed the databases that contributed most the... You to select multiple options itself is unfiltered, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the results were compared finding...